C++Talk.NET C++ language newsgroups   Archives   FAQ   Search   Memberlist   Usergroups   Register   Profile   Log in to check your private messages   Log in  Solution to DR 410 disagrees with existing implementations?          C++Talk.NET Forum Index -> C++ language, library and standards View previous topic :: View next topic   Author Message chris jefferson Guest Posted: Wed May 11, 2005 8:59 pm    Post subject: Solution to DR 410 disagrees with existing implementations? The solution to DR 410 adds the definition exact definition of various operators to stack and queue. It just passes each operator through to the underlying container, so for example x<=y is implemented as x.c<=y.c In the rationale, it says: "There isn't any real doubt about what these operators are supposed to do, but we ought to spell it out." Looking at g++ 3.3 & 4.0, icc 8.1, vc++6 and the latest version of comeau (all the compilers I have access to), it is true they all agree on how to implement these operators, but they all disagree with the Defect Report! All these compilers implement these operators in terms of just < and == on the underlying containers (so x<=y is implemented at !(y I just wanted to check (and sorry if this is a silly question). Was it intentional for the DR to disagree with most of the existing implementations? Chris --- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ] [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ] Back to top Paolo Carlini Guest Posted: Mon May 16, 2005 4:18 pm    Post subject: Re: Solution to DR 410 disagrees with existing implementatio chris jefferson wrote: Quote: All these compilers implement these operators in terms of just < and == on the underlying containers (so x<=y is implemented at !(y I just wanted to check (and sorry if this is a silly question). Was it intentional for the DR to disagree with most of the existing implementations? Given the operational semantics of container comparison operators - Table 65 - I disagree about the disagreement ;) Paolo. --- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ] [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ] Back to top Display posts from previous: All Posts1 Day7 Days2 Weeks1 Month3 Months6 Months1 Year Oldest FirstNewest First         C++Talk.NET Forum Index -> C++ language, library and standards All times are GMT Page 1 of 1   Jump to: Select a forum C/C++----------------C LanguageC Language (Moderated)C++ Language (Moderated)C++ language (comp.lang.c++)C++ language, library and standards Non-English C/C++ Newsgroups----------------C++ (German)C++ (French)  You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2006 phpBB Group SEO toolkit © 2004-2006 webmedic.