C++Talk.NET Forum Index C++Talk.NET
C++ language newsgroups
 
Archives   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Small improvement to n1613 (Design by Contract)

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    C++Talk.NET Forum Index -> C++ language, library and standards
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Robert Kawulak
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Jul 03, 2004 1:21 am    Post subject: Small improvement to n1613 (Design by Contract) Reply with quote



I'd like to suggest a small change to paper n1613 - "Proposal to add Design
by Contract to C++". I think that the ':' symbol (meaning 'otherwise') used
in precondition blocks should be exchanged for 'else' keyword. That is the
example

in
{
r > 0.0: throw bad_input();
}

should look like this:

in
{
r > 0.0 else throw bad_input();
}

I can list at least two reasons for this:
1. 'else' is much more meaningful and obvious than ':', it's easier to
understand the code,
2. 'else' is much more readable, especially in long expressions or those
containing the ?: operator.

Greetings,
RK


---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    C++Talk.NET Forum Index -> C++ language, library and standards All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2006 phpBB Group
SEO toolkit © 2004-2006 webmedic.