 |
C++Talk.NET C++ language newsgroups
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Leor Zolman Guest
|
Posted: Thu Apr 01, 2004 6:56 pm Post subject: section number error wrt getline |
|
|
I've never posted in this group, so sorry that I don't know how to check
for whether or not this has been reported...
In section 21.3/5, the following bullet item appears:
As an argument to nonmember
functions swap() (21.3.7. , operator>>() (21.3.7.9), and
getline() (21.3.7.9).
The section number given for getline() is the same as the preceding one for
oeprator>>(), so presumably wrong.
-leor
--
Leor Zolman --- BD Software --- www.bdsoft.com
On-Site Training in C/C++, Java, Perl and Unix
C++ users: Download BD Software's free STL Error Message Decryptor at:
www.bdsoft.com/tools/stlfilt.html
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pete Becker Guest
|
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2004 12:14 am Post subject: Re: section number error wrt getline |
|
|
Leor Zolman wrote:
| Quote: |
I've never posted in this group, so sorry that I don't know how to check
for whether or not this has been reported...
In section 21.3/5, the following bullet item appears:
As an argument to nonmember
functions swap() (21.3.7. , operator>>() (21.3.7.9), and
getline() (21.3.7.9).
The section number given for getline() is the same as the preceding one for
oeprator>>(), so presumably wrong.
|
That's the danger in presumptions: they're sometimes wrong. <g>
Subclause 21.3.7.9 has the specifications for operator>>, operator<<,
and getline.
--
Pete Becker
Dinkumware, Ltd. (http://www.dinkumware.com)
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Leor Zolman Guest
|
Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2004 7:31 pm Post subject: Re: section number error wrt getline |
|
|
On Sun, 4 Apr 2004 00:14:51 +0000 (UTC), [email]petebecker (AT) acm (DOT) org[/email] (Pete Becker)
wrote:
| Quote: | Leor Zolman wrote:
I've never posted in this group, so sorry that I don't know how to check
for whether or not this has been reported...
In section 21.3/5, the following bullet item appears:
As an argument to nonmember
functions swap() (21.3.7. , operator>>() (21.3.7.9), and
getline() (21.3.7.9).
The section number given for getline() is the same as the preceding one for
oeprator>>(), so presumably wrong.
That's the danger in presumptions: they're sometimes wrong. <g
Subclause 21.3.7.9 has the specifications for operator>>, operator<<,
and getline.
|
Thanks Pete. Actually I didn't just presume without looking at 21.3.7.9,
but this is apparently one case where I should have taken the time to make
the font size bigger
-leor
--
Leor Zolman --- BD Software --- www.bdsoft.com
On-Site Training in C/C++, Java, Perl and Unix
C++ users: Download BD Software's free STL Error Message Decryptor at:
www.bdsoft.com/tools/stlfilt.html
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pete Becker Guest
|
Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2004 10:32 pm Post subject: Re: section number error wrt getline |
|
|
Leor Zolman wrote:
| Quote: |
Thanks Pete. Actually I didn't just presume without looking at 21.3.7.9,
but this is apparently one case where I should have taken the time to make
the font size bigger
|
The library clause is hard to read in many places because the function
signatures tend to disappear. Future versions will fix this.
--
Pete Becker
Dinkumware, Ltd. (http://www.dinkumware.com)
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|