C++Talk.NET C++ language newsgroups   Archives   FAQ   Search   Memberlist   Usergroups   Register   Profile   Log in to check your private messages   Log in  Re: g++ (3.3) bug?          C++Talk.NET Forum Index -> C++ language, library and standards View previous topic :: View next topic   Author Message Christopher Benson-Manica Guest Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2004 9:45 pm    Post subject: Re: g++ (3.3) bug? Kevin Goodsell <usenet2.spamfree.fusion (AT) neverbox (DOT) com> spoke thus: (moving to comp.std.c++) Quote: Christopher Benson-Manica wrote: __FUNCTION__ isn't standard, but C99 specifies the __func__ predefined identifier, which I believe is #define'd to be __FUNCTION__ for OP's implementation. I would be interested to know whether __func__ made it into standard C++ as well. Not yet. C++ hasn't added any new features since the first standard in 1998. Does "not yet" mean that it's planned for the next version of the C++ standard? -- Christopher Benson-Manica | I *should* know what I'm talking about - if I ataru(at)cyberspace.org | don't, I need to know. Flames welcome. --- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ] [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ] Back to top Michiel Salters Guest Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 6:02 pm    Post subject: Re: g++ (3.3) bug? [email]ataru (AT) nospam (DOT) cyberspace.org[/email] (Christopher Benson-Manica) wrote in message news:<c6155c$4ni$1 (AT) chessie (DOT) cirr.com>... Quote: Kevin Goodsell <usenet2.spamfree.fusion (AT) neverbox (DOT) com> spoke thus: (moving to comp.std.c++) Christopher Benson-Manica wrote: __FUNCTION__ isn't standard, but C99 specifies the __func__ predefined identifier, which I believe is #define'd to be __FUNCTION__ for OP's implementation. I would be interested to know whether __func__ made it into standard C++ as well. Not yet. C++ hasn't added any new features since the first standard in 1998. Does "not yet" mean that it's planned for the next version of the C++ standard? There is some obvious discussion about the meaning of __func__ in C++ special cases - the destructor mentioned before, namespaces - but it is covered by the desire to create a viable subset of C99 and C++0x. So s/planned/considered/ and you're right. Regards, Michiel Salters --- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ] [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ] Back to top Display posts from previous: All Posts1 Day7 Days2 Weeks1 Month3 Months6 Months1 Year Oldest FirstNewest First         C++Talk.NET Forum Index -> C++ language, library and standards All times are GMT Page 1 of 1   Jump to: Select a forum C/C++----------------C LanguageC Language (Moderated)C++ Language (Moderated)C++ language (comp.lang.c++)C++ language, library and standards Non-English C/C++ Newsgroups----------------C++ (German)C++ (French)  You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2006 phpBB Group SEO toolkit © 2004-2006 webmedic.