C++Talk.NET Forum Index C++Talk.NET
C++ language newsgroups
 
Archives   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Purported ambiguity of operator==(unsigned short, int)

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    C++Talk.NET Forum Index -> C++ language, library and standards
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Guest






PostPosted: Wed May 10, 2006 4:21 pm    Post subject: Purported ambiguity of operator==(unsigned short, int) Reply with quote



Which section of the standard should I refer to to resolve the
following ambiguity?

For the code fragment below, I get conflicting results on different
compilers I have
access to. One compiler doesn't complain and the other does.

Compilation requires that the compiler determine that application of
the available
conversion operator is sufficient to allow a built-in operator==(int,
int) to be applied.

class C
{
public:
C(unsigned short);
friend bool operator==(unsigned short, const C&);

};

class X
{
public:
operator unsigned short() const;

};

bool fail1(const X& x)
{
return x == 0x1234;

}

bool fail2(const X& x)
{
return x == (unsigned short) 0x1234;

}

---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html ]
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    C++Talk.NET Forum Index -> C++ language, library and standards All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2006 phpBB Group
SEO toolkit © 2004-2006 webmedic.