 |
C++Talk.NET C++ language newsgroups
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
apm Guest
|
Posted: Fri May 14, 2004 12:08 am Post subject: Normal distribution enhacements in C++ technical report |
|
|
Has anyone looked at the C++ technical report concerned with proposed
additions to the language? There is a tonne of stuff in there
including hash containers, various maths routine, random number
generation etc. There is also mention of stuff to support normal
distributions. However, unless there is something wrong with my maths
the TR describes a gaussian distribution rather than a normal
distribution. AFAIK, the later is the formal that has been adjusted to
have a mean of zero and a std deviation of unity. Perhaps the TR need
correcting?
Regards,
Andrew Marlow
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pete Becker Guest
|
Posted: Fri May 14, 2004 2:20 am Post subject: Re: Normal distribution enhacements in C++ technical report |
|
|
apm wrote:
| Quote: |
Has anyone looked at the C++ technical report concerned with proposed
additions to the language? There is a tonne of stuff in there
including hash containers, various maths routine, random number
generation etc. There is also mention of stuff to support normal
distributions. However, unless there is something wrong with my maths
the TR describes a gaussian distribution rather than a normal
distribution. AFAIK, the later is the formal that has been adjusted to
have a mean of zero and a std deviation of unity. Perhaps the TR need
correcting?
|
This is an area where names sometimes vary, but the name "normal
distribution" as used in TR1 is also used the same way in other places.
For example, see
www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/eda/section3/eda3661.htm, which calls
that formula a "normal distribution" and says that the special case
where the mean is 0 and the deviation is 1 is a "standard normal
distribution."
--
Pete Becker
Dinkumware, Ltd. (http://www.dinkumware.com)
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alberto Barbati Guest
|
Posted: Fri May 14, 2004 3:02 pm Post subject: Re: Normal distribution enhacements in C++ technical report |
|
|
Pete Becker wrote:
| Quote: |
This is an area where names sometimes vary, but the name "normal
distribution" as used in TR1 is also used the same way in other places.
For example, see
www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/eda/section3/eda3661.htm, which calls
that formula a "normal distribution" and says that the special case
where the mean is 0 and the deviation is 1 is a "standard normal
distribution."
|
Same terminology here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normal_distribution
where it's also said explicitly that "[The normal distribution] is also
called the Gaussian distribution, especially in physics and engineering".
Alberto
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
apm Guest
|
Posted: Fri May 14, 2004 10:51 pm Post subject: Re: Normal distribution enhacements in C++ technical report |
|
|
[email]petebecker (AT) acm (DOT) org[/email] (Pete Becker) wrote in message news:<40A41351.E0D38D6D (AT) acm (DOT) org>...
| Quote: | apm wrote:
However, unless there is something wrong with my maths
the TR describes a gaussian distribution rather than a normal
distribution. AFAIK, the later is the formal that has been adjusted to
have a mean of zero and a std deviation of unity. Perhaps the TR need
correcting?
This is an area where names sometimes vary, but the name "normal
distribution" as used in TR1 is also used the same way in other places.
For example, see
www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/eda/section3/eda3661.htm, which calls
that formula a "normal distribution" and says that the special case
where the mean is 0 and the deviation is 1 is a "standard normal
distribution."
|
I stand corrected. Thanks for the info!
-Andrew M.
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Walter Tross Guest
|
Posted: Sat May 15, 2004 3:09 am Post subject: Re: Normal distribution enhacements in C++ technical report |
|
|
apm 2004-05-14 :
| Quote: | Has anyone looked at the C++ technical report concerned with proposed
additions to the language? There is a tonne of stuff in there
including hash containers, various maths routine, random number
generation etc. There is also mention of stuff to support normal
distributions. However, unless there is something wrong with my maths
the TR describes a gaussian distribution rather than a normal
distribution. AFAIK, the later is the formal that has been adjusted to
have a mean of zero and a std deviation of unity. Perhaps the TR need
correcting?
|
I don't have my math and physics books at hand right now, but perhaps it
helps to know that in "Numerical Recipes in C++" (Press, Teukolsky,
Vetterling, Flannery) the terms "Gaussian" and "normal" are used
interchangeably?
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|