C++Talk.NET Forum Index C++Talk.NET
C++ language newsgroups
 
Archives   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Finding dupilcate entry in a STL

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    C++Talk.NET Forum Index -> C++ language (comp.lang.c++)
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2006 4:00 pm    Post subject: Finding dupilcate entry in a STL Reply with quote



Hi,

I have a function which check if there is duplicate entries in a STL
list:

bool hasDuplicateY() {

sort(_aList.begin(), _aList.end(), sort_y_comparator<A*>());
AList::iterator iter;

iter = adjacent_find ( _aList.begin(), _aList.end(), SameY());

if (iter == _aList.end())

return false;
else
return true;
}

bool SameY::operator()( A* bd1, A* bd2)
{
return bd1->y == bd2->y;
}


template<class T> struct sort_y_comparator : public
binary_function<T,T,bool>
{
sort_y_comparator() {}

bool operator()(const T r1, const T r2) const
{
return (r1->y < r2->y);
}
};


But the above function always return true even if there is no
duplication in the list.
Can you please tell me what have I done wrong?

Thank you.
Back to top
Thomas Tutone
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2006 6:00 pm    Post subject: Re: Finding dupilcate entry in a STL Reply with quote



ken.carlino (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:

Quote:
I have a function which check if there is duplicate entries in a STL
list:

bool hasDuplicateY() {

sort(_aList.begin(), _aList.end(), sort_y_comparator<A*>());

You can't use std::sort on a std::list, because a std::list doesn't
have random access iterators. I'm surprised this even compiled. Use
std::list member function list::sort() instead.

Quote:
AList::iterator iter;

iter = adjacent_find ( _aList.begin(), _aList.end(), SameY());

if (iter == _aList.end())

return false;
else
return true;

Why not just:

AList::iterator iter = adjacent_find(_aList.begin(), _aList.end(),
SameY());
return iter!=_aList.end();

or even just:

return adjacent_find(_aList.begin(),
_aList.end(),
SameY()) != _aList.end();

Quote:
}

bool SameY::operator()( A* bd1, A* bd2)
{
return bd1->y == bd2->y;
}


template<class T> struct sort_y_comparator : public
binary_function<T,T,bool
{
sort_y_comparator() {}

Many would recommend that you omit that constructor if the default will
do just fine.

Quote:

bool operator()(const T r1, const T r2) const
{
return (r1->y < r2->y);
}
};


But the above function always return true even if there is no
duplication in the list.
Can you please tell me what have I done wrong?

First, fix the problem with std::sort. Then, if you're still having
the problem, re-post, this time including code we can actually compile,
rather than just a snippet.

Good luck.

Best regards,

Tom
Back to top
Thomas Tutone
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2006 10:00 pm    Post subject: Re: Finding dupilcate entry in a STL Reply with quote



Thomas Tutone wrote:

Quote:
Many would recommend that you omit that constructor if the default will
do just fine.

I meant to say that many would recommend that you omit that constructor
if the compiler-generated constructor will do just fine.

Best regards,

Tom
Back to top
Nitin Motgi
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 12:00 am    Post subject: Re: Finding dupilcate entry in a STL Reply with quote

ken.carlino (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:
Quote:
Hi,

I have a function which check if there is duplicate entries in a STL
list:

bool hasDuplicateY() {

sort(_aList.begin(), _aList.end(), sort_y_comparator<A*>());
AList::iterator iter;

If you are using std::list they model the Reversible Containers who's
iterators are only bidirectional iterators. The sort you have used in
you program is a general algorithm applied to containers that support
Random Iterators. In order to sort the list of type std::list you can
use the sort provided by std::list using bidirectional iterators.

Change the following
sort(_aList.begin(), _aList.end(), sort_y_comparator<A*>());
TO
_aList.sort(sort_y_comparator<A*>()); ==> Will sort your list.

-- Nitin Motgi
Back to top
Nitin Motgi
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 12:00 am    Post subject: Re: Finding dupilcate entry in a STL Reply with quote

ken.carlino (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:
Quote:
Hi,

I have a function which check if there is duplicate entries in a STL
list:

bool hasDuplicateY() {

sort(_aList.begin(), _aList.end(), sort_y_comparator<A*>());
AList::iterator iter;

If you are using std::list they model the Reversible Containers who's
iterators are only bidirectional iterators. The sort you have used in
you program is a general algorithm applied to containers that support
Random Iterators. In order to sort the list of type std::list you can
use the sort provided by std::list using bidirectional iterators.

Change the following
sort(_aList.begin(), _aList.end(), sort_y_comparator<A*>());
TO
_aList.sort(sort_y_comparator<A*>()); ==> Will sort your list.

-- Nitin Motgi
Back to top
Daniel T.
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 1:00 pm    Post subject: Re: Finding dupilcate entry in a STL Reply with quote

In article <1138636282.225433.60450 (AT) g14g2000cwa (DOT) googlegroups.com>,
ken.carlino (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:

Quote:
Hi,

I have a function which check if there is duplicate entries in a STL
list:

bool hasDuplicateY() {

sort(_aList.begin(), _aList.end(), sort_y_comparator<A*>());
AList::iterator iter;

iter = adjacent_find ( _aList.begin(), _aList.end(), SameY());

if (iter == _aList.end())

return false;
else
return true;
}

As others have already said, the 'sort' above should be
_aList.sort(...), and this can be written much more compactly...

_aList.sort(sort_y_comparator<A*>());
return adjacent_find(_aList.begin(), _aList.end(), SameY()) !=
aList.end();

Quote:

bool SameY::operator()( A* bd1, A* bd2)
{
return bd1->y == bd2->y;
}


template<class T> struct sort_y_comparator : public
binary_function<T,T,bool
{
sort_y_comparator() {}

bool operator()(const T r1, const T r2) const
{
return (r1->y < r2->y);
}
};

I wouldn't make the above a template, the only types it can take are
ones that can handle "->y" which is pretty limited...

Did you notice how your sort_y_comparator and your 'SameY' look alot
alike? The only difference between them is the actual compare ('==' in
one and '<' in the other.) I would think you could factor out that
duplication...

struct A {
int y;
};

// better would be to make A a class and make this a member-function
int& getY( A* a ) {
return a->y;
}

bool hasDuplicateY( list<A*>& aList )
{
aList.sort(f_gx_gy(less<int>(), ptr_fun(&getY)));
return adjacent_find(aList.begin(), aList.end(),
f_gx_gy(equal_to<int>(), ptr_fun(&getY))) != aList.end();
}

To make the above work, you need a composer like this:

template <typename Op1, typename Op2, typename Op3>
class f_gx_hy_t: public std::binary_function<typename
Op2::argument_type, typename Op3::argument_type, typename
Op1::result_type>
{
Op1 fn1;
Op2 fn2;
Op3 fn3;
public:
f_gx_hy_t(const Op1& f, const Op2& g, const Op3& h):
fn1(f), fn2(g), fn3(h) { }

typename Op1::result_type operator()(const typename
Op2::argument_type& x, const typename Op3::argument_type& y) const {
return fn1(fn2(x), fn3(y));
}
};

template <typename Op1, typename Op2>
inline f_gx_hy_t<Op1, Op2, Op2>
f_gx_gy(const Op1& f, const Op2& g) {
return f_gx_hy_t<Op1, Op2, Op2>(f, g, g);
}


Presumably, this can be done even simpler using the boost::lambda
library.
<http://www.boost.org/doc/html/lambda.html>

--
Magic depends on tradition and belief. It does not welcome observation,
nor does it profit by experiment. On the other hand, science is based
on experience; it is open to correction by observation and experiment.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    C++Talk.NET Forum Index -> C++ language (comp.lang.c++) All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2006 phpBB Group
SEO toolkit © 2004-2006 webmedic.