C++ language, library and standards [Archive]
View Full Version : C++ language, library and standards
- C++ wishlist
- Eliminating uninitialised variables
- Proposal: New types in C++0x
- Range type (Re: Proposal: New types in C++0x)
- tempate new syntax [was: Re: Evolution of C++ : Thinking ahe
- Why must values in case labels be compile-time constants?
- "this" cannot be used in ctor handlers?
- Pre-Redmond Mailing: some thoughts to 1704 & 1706
- Issue with Pre-Redmond Mailing
- How to submit a proposal for a new C++ feature / standard li
- Clarification needed for code in 3.4.1[3]
- forward definition of nested classes
- 1998 vs 2003 standard
- Exceptions Footprint
- Rvalue Reference question: Overloading on whether *this is
- Imagine you could pass a code block to a template parameter
- Convertible to T
- swapping std::pairs?
- [C++0x] Call a method last (close file conundrum)
- std::valarray wishlist
- Traces left of ios in current C++ Standard
- COW strings banned because of exceptions? was: Re: Vindicate
- Proposals for a better C++
- Small problem with Draft TR1 (N1660=04-0100)
- Standard signature for allocator destructor?
- Unions up in arms!
- Defect Report: Placement array new cannot be used portably
- Whats "convertible to"
- Is thread cancellation worth the trouble? Look at how QNX do
- Explicit Functions?
- Re: Thread support in C++? [was "Unpopular C++ ideas"]
- repeated typedefs
- defect 178 : initialisation in new expression ?
- No not1/not2 replacement?
- Template functions and extern "C"?
- Why not a copy_if() algorithm?
- Non-terminal default arguments?
- Why isn't there a heap class?
- Proposal: Constructor for {} initialisation
- Pointless ambiguity??
- can't this be a feature in C++?
- can't this be a feature in C++?
- abstract class as first template argument to ostream_iterato
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2006 phpBB Group.