C++ language, library and standards [Archive]
View Full Version : C++ language, library and standards
- proposed: non-deduced context scope resolution operator :0:
- Re: Unpopular C++ ideas
- Re-initializing of references
- C++ and Middleware
- Proposal: /associate(d)/ access specifier
- aliasing and the STL
- Other binary and unary shorthand assignment operators
- valarrays, iterators, indirection and aliasing
- The future of C++
- Definition of /header/ and/or /source file/
- Proposal for new feature in both C and C++
- Defining func_obj_traits similar to iterator_traits
- Lockiing/threading proposal for discussion
- delegations and interfaces
- Summary Table for TR1
- extention to n1611
- Meaning of "callable"
- Deducing class template parameters
- Proposal for Interfaces (version 3.0)
- Proposal: interfaces
- Interfaces proposal (version 4.0)
- Pointer-to-members for Standard Library member functions
- Question about ADL
- Dear All,
- Looking for co-authour
- allocator as ctor argument versus part of the type
- N1618 - Template constructors of template classes
- ignore zero or more
- N1647 - Naming of xor_combine members
- A backward compatible suggestion for the next standard
- N1647 - editing error in bernoulli_distribution
- Proposal: Interfaces (rewritten)
- Libraries sans headers.
- Rationale for "this->" in template derived classes?
- about exception of standard
- Proposal: free() and delete/delete[] compatibility
- (NONE)
- Re: alternative tokens
- Code templates
- Explicit conversion operators
- Re: g++ (3.3) bug?
- return 1; suggestion
- Re: Why are fundamental type sizes not exactly specified?
- C++ danger to break due to its weight, fragmentation danger
- question : 2.4 preprocessor tokens
- Proposal for C++0x: return 1; statement
- atexit and/or objects with global storage duration
- Proposal for C++0x: return 1; statement
- If you really want interfaces, the linker must do more work
- Nested namespaces definition
- Suggestions for new STL functions
- Logical XOR
- Logical XOR
- Re: Why not dynamic_cast via type_info?
- Why are template typedefs not allowed?
- section number error wrt getline
- literal arrays
- "explicit class" (proposal N1582)
- Defect Report: basic.start.init 3 missing --end example
- Re: Common baseclass for all
- Is the 'raw' form of the Standard (SG|X)ML??
- wbuffer_convert
- Defect report: Default modes missing from basic_fstream memb
- Defect Report: 3.8/9 example
- Default arguments
- Re: Allowing definition of file-local private member functio
- Defect Report: Jump past initialization of local static vari
- Re: A comment about library issue 416
- Re: A comment about library issue 434
- Re: unnamed class constructor
- The C subset of C++. Forked from Common baseclass for all
- using-directives and dynamic binding
- Re: conversion from const char * to const char *&
- Re: Exception hierarchy
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2006 phpBB Group.