C++ language, library and standards [Archive]

View Full Version : C++ language, library and standards


  1. Re: allocators...exceptions...new/delete
  2. Re: qualified function names and two phase lookup
  3. multi-level break
  4. Is this valid code?
  5. Comments on TR1 smart pointers
  6. Why isn't this allowed in C++?
  7. A humble attempt to improve "Move proposal"
  8. lvalues, rvalues and reference lifetime
  9. Re: Controlling order of construction for globals/statics
  10. forward declaration
  11. Re: Using the copy constructor for moving
  12. Re: parameter no_sideeffect (c++0x)
  13. Re: cannot compare base* to const derrived*
  14. Voided application of indirection operator to pointer-to-voi
  15. Should class-member using declarations behave differently fr
  16. Re: Using friend member definition for specialization
  17. Expanding the definition of constant expressions
  18. Re: Multiple explicit instantiations?
  19. Re: Official c++ 64-bit integer data type
  20. empty POD struct?
  21. 'instance of a function' in clause 3 para 3. [Was: Object-Or
  22. Inconsistent (re)declarations of virtual functions
  23. basic_stream extraction and width
  24. Re: size_type of standard containers
  25. Re: Article: allocators...exceptions...new/delete [reply to:
  26. Bug in 17.3.2.1 ??
  27. Re: is C++ implementation allowed to store object in non-con
  28. template class with template base class confusion...
  29. article: allocators...exceptions...new/delete [reply to: Sat
  30. Re: Article: allocators...exceptions...new/delete [reply to:
  31. Is a single quotation mark at the end of a translation unit
  32. Re: Post Increment/decrement operator suggestion.
  33. Article: allocators...exceptions...new/delete [reply to: Sat
  34. Re: Boost and the next C++ Standards
  35. About DR 372
  36. Unsigned/Signed Mismatch
  37. Libraries in the TR
  38. Defect report [basic.life], cannot call base class functions
  39. Re: Using declarations and class member ambiguities
  40. Re: Why in the world is this ambiguous?
  41. Re: expliciting data-links: a feature for enhancing program
  42. Re: Class declarations and using-declarations
  43. Re: is C++ implementation allowed to store object in non-con




  44. Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2006 phpBB Group.